Bridget Jones II is so bad on so many levels that it will be difficult for me to keep this post deservingly short. If you’re in a hurry, read my title.
[But first, in answer to Eric’s thoughtful enquiry, I have not been following anything like my usual routine lately. That, my being ill over the weekend, and my general Internet problems have made for meagre posting. I hope to get back into a rhythm next week.]
Now, back to what is almost certain to be the worst film of the year, because, unlike most other bad films, it cannot cite limited funding or talent or interest as excuses for its badness. I set out ready to like it. I was dragged to the first one and was hugely and pleasantly surprised that it turned a thin joke in The Independent (which I read regularly while I was actually working “in the media” in London) into a funny, almost-spiky mainstream comedy. This time I had been invited to a première and I happily put on black tie for what I thought would be a fun night out. It was a fun night out, but not because of the movie, which, I must remind you, I was already well-disposed towards. I have plenty of time for a good chick flick and I am so susceptible to cinematic sentimentality that I could be made to cry by a well-scripted advertisement for feminine hygiene products.
BJ2 isn’t just a bad chick flick. It is a bad flick. It is artistically bad. It is intellectually bad. It is technically bad. It is morally bad.
BJ2 is bad because it has an insultingly implausible script acted by people phoning in their performances from a runaway trolley in a disused tin mine in Cornwall on a broken mobile phone with a weak battery. BJ2 is bad because it is as moving as a plea for clemency from Saddam Hussein. It is bad because its soundtrack was cobbled together at high-level meetings between various large London music publishing companies wanting to “monetize” their back catalogues and the people representing permatanned pop singers with vocal chords made from expanded foam packing materials wanting to maximize their exposure. BJ2 is bad because it pretends to be quirky and modern even as it pushes an ideal of womanhood as damaging as foot binding.
Is there anything good about BJ2? There is.
Saints preserve us, one of them is Hugh Grant. Every time he appears on screen he manages to bag at least one of the ten good lines in the film. He is as unconvincing as the rest of the cast, but at least he is funny. He mugs so much I kept expecting him to turn to the audience and address us directly: “Yeah, of course it’s cack, but it’s too late now: you’ve paid. Hah!”
Another is Renée Zellweger who—heaven knows why—has been doing the interview rounds saying that she would only have allowed herself to do Bridget again if the screenplay had some substance. So why the fuck did she feed herself up, wobble around in unflattering clothes, and generally out-ugly late-period Brando for this? She is enthusiastic and her accent is excellent (if odd), but she is a wave function approximating to a person. Despite her efforts, just as I wanted every character in The Blair Witch Project to die horribly within about fifteen minutes of meeting them, I wanted BJ to suffer every indignity visited upon her. How are we supposed to believe that a woman I would dump for her utter childishness shortly after opening the wine menu is so appealing to so many other people in this story? [I’d prefer it if people didn’t address that one directly in the comments, thank you.]
Zellweger is, however, responsible for much of the third good thing: the physical comedy. I hate physical comedy because it is almost always stupid. But, like Diana Spencer in a posh nursery when the other staff are outside the building, the falling about is at least a little bit more sophisticated than much of what it going on around it. There is a nicely choreographed skiing sequence, and Hugh Grant and Colin Firth reprise their crap fighting to amusing effect. (Perhaps another good thing about this film is that, after his fifty-seven-varieties-of-tedious-brooding contribution to this, women will go off him completely and no longer wibble on about Firth clambering out of That Bloody Lake.)
Tell everyone you know not to see this. I know I will. I am proud to say that I opened my cheque book for charity this evening, rather than for the cynical bastards responsible for this crime against film-making, not that it will make much difference. After all the other screenings they’ll be shovelling it into the back of people carrier, just like they’re shovelling their poisonous sexist myths into the minds of millions of impressionable young women: dye your hair blonde, get a girly job, totter around spouting pop culture bollocks, drink, smoke and talk about “shagging” a lot, and generally don’t bother your pretty little head with anything too challenging; and perhaps a nice old Etonian (an emotionally constipated one, naturally) with a title and an impressive-sounding, right-on, well-paid job will rescue you from your insignificance by asking you to be his wife. It’s okay: it’s ironic.
Girls, just say no.
[…] know what had happened to “the ranting”. Tell me, people, am I losing my edge? Was I too easy on Bridget Jones II? I’m fierce, I tell ya, fierce. Grrr. […]
[…] A Reader Writes
Following on from my review of Bridget Jones 2 a new correspondent—not
PooterGeek » A Reader Writes says:
22Nov04 at 21:45
-
Eric says:
11Nov04 at 14:44
-
PooterGeek says:
11Nov04 at 14:54
-
it comes in pints? says:
11Nov04 at 22:28
-
Michael Brooke says:
12Nov04 at 13:15
-
Tightly Wound says:
12Nov04 at 15:47
-
James says:
12Nov04 at 18:29
-
PooterGeek says:
12Nov04 at 19:13
-
Thandi says:
18Nov04 at 04:32
-
PooterGeek says:
18Nov04 at 10:23
-
Timbeaux says:
18Nov04 at 22:20
-
Thandi says:
11Sep07 at 12:41
-
PooterGeek says:
11Sep07 at 13:12
[…] Following on from my review of Bridget Jones 2 a new correspondent—not our friend from Switzerland—has just emailed the following message, entitled “S […]
Oh dear. As someone who will have to go and see this (I have no choice in the matter) I am somewhat disturbed by your post, the first wasn’t a bad film.
I may sneak out in the darkness to Alien vs Predator, an equally dire film, but which does have the saving grave that most of the cast is killed off one way or another.
Funnily enough, one of my fellow filmgoers yesterday said that two works outings had been organised from his place of employment: the boys had set out for AvP, so the girls planned a BJ2 excursion to follow. Bridget vs. Predator: “Whoever Wins, We Lose”.
Paging Sheila O’Malley
You simply must read this review of the new Bridget Jones movie….
Oh dear. As someone who will have to go and see this (I have no choice in the matter) I am somewhat disturbed by your post
So was I, but fortunately my wife conceded that my willingness to accompany her to Finding Neverland on Wednesday means that I don’t have to see Bridget Jones with her after all. “In any case”, she pointed out, “if you stay at home we’ll save a fortune on babysitters and I can have the kind of girls’ night out that I haven’t had for ages.”
So it looks as though it’s smiles all round – at least until the film actually starts, but that’s not my problem any more.
Movies, Movies Everywhere
And I don’t know what to see. We’ve had a running tradition for the past few years about holiday movie viewings: Hublet, Beloved Uncle and I have trekked cineplex-ward on the Friday after Thanksgiving to view a flick ever since…
I’m sorry, I have to ask (I might be missing something here) – BG? Bridget Gones?
Whoops. All I can say in my defence is that I had been drinking champagne. Fixed it now.
Dear Mr Geek!
In view of your bad grammar and blaming typing errors on champagne, I am astonished that you have the cheek to rate this movie as “intellectually bad”! I assume English is your mother tongue; if not, I retract this statement. (Tip: use Spell Check, so as to reduce the disrespect you display towards your readers) By the way, I enjoyed the 1st movie and still intend to see BJ2. I read both books and found each to be great relaxing light entertaiment.
Yours sincerely
Thandi
“In view of your bad grammar and blaming typing errors on champagne, I am astonished that you have the cheek to rate this movie as ‘intellectually bad’!”
If those are your criteria for intellectual achievement then you’d better stick to Helen Fielding and avoid William Shakespeare. The man could barely write his own name correctly.
I have the cheek to rate this movie as bad because I have seen it. There is a difference between sitting alone and dashing off a review in the small hours after an evening of partying and spending millions of dollars and thousands of (wo)man hours on a “major motion picture”. Given that my readers pay me nothing and that it would cost them about six quid to see the movie I think I can hold the personnel of Working Title to slightly higher standards. Though there were probably more laughs and fewer errors in my review than in the script of the film itself.
(For my own education, I’d be interested to know where my grammar was “bad” and where I “showed disrespect” to my readers by misspelling words, though. And beginning sentences with conjunctions or prepositions doesn’t count. When I break the rules of English I usually do so for a reason.)
She probably thinks you misspelled “cheque”! 🙂
Dear Mr Geek, kind sir!
It would be greatly appreciated if you would kindly delete my contribution from your site, for it comes up every time my name is Googled (great points for your site; respect!). Unfortunately it is not advantageous for my own business internet site (too frivilous, if you understand my meaning).
Regards
Thandi
I’ve removed your surname and location.