Over at Kamm’s ‘Blog on Friday, the proprietor launched a thoroughly deserved attack on Rupert Read.

[The rest of this entry was a rant about Rupert and one of his papers. Although I still disagree violently with his letter to the Telegraph and am very skeptical about the content of that paper, Rupert has offered—very kindly under ths circumstances, since I also confused him with someone else—to open up a discussion with me about his approach to philosophy, based around my objections. I think I might borrow from The Professor‘s normblog and approach it in an interview style. Watch this (or a nearby) space.]