“‘Labour Party’? Dictatorship Party more like!”
I am standing in the street with a couple of other local party members and the local Labour MEP. We are armed with highly explosive balloons. The person ranting at me is about 22, has a whispy blond goatee, multiple piercings and a grating, sneering, estuarine voice. He is telling me why he will never vote Labour again. Iraq, apparently, is radioactive as a result of our attacks with depleted uranium shells and yesterday the US marines killed 600 people, most of them women and children. I am, to my shame, losing my temper. The switch flipped when he said “If he [Saddam] wants to be a dictator it’s his business. It’s not for us to go and kill thousands of people.”
Another tells me that she voted Labour once, but cannot support Tony Blair now because of his “sickly smile”. She does not want to support any of the other leaders either because they are “not statesmen”.
And, of course, there is the surreality factor: Cambridge is a place of deep and perpetual strangeness.
One potential voter juggles a melon and a giant box of cornflakes while confiding in me interestingly and at length about his crisis of political conscience. He has been reading a biography of Churchill. It has increased his sense of the importance of the individual and now he is finding it difficult to reconcile this feeling with his traditional Left-wing affinity for collective action.
Later, I am approached by a woman who has individual strategies for her votes in the council, general and European elections. “This is going to sound mad,” she begins at one point, “but I was sitting next the Lord Chancellor at dinner last night”.
“At Pembroke College?”
“Yes.”
“I was at that dinner too.”
She is momentarily thrown.
“I was sitting next the Lord Chancellor at dinner last night and I spent half-an-hour telling him why I can no longer vote for a Labour government.”
Her reasons are very good. I can’t argue with them, but I still ask for her vote.
The MEP, Richard Howitt, has to deal with a refugee from Chile who fled Pinochet and still bears a deep grudge against Bush Snr (as former head of the CIA). She has transferred her resentment to Bush Jr. Howitt doesn’t stand a chance. This morning’s front pages are full of pictures of this meeting between Blair and Bush.
Don’t be misled by my choice of snapshots. On the whole, campaigning in the street in Cambridge today is simple and pleasant. So many punters happily take a leaflet, chat politely, and often people claim to be life-long Labour supporters, but occasionally I see what a bloody awful business politics can be.
As Howitt’s lift arrives, a drunk on a bike shouts “MPs! Fuck off!” and continues to abuse him as he puts stuff into the car before he is driven away.
UPDATE: Here are Richard and Damian, and their sickly smiles [photo by Alex Mayer].
Well, to be far to the young lad, the use of depleted uranium shells *has* made Iraq more radioactive than it was. Just not a great deal more.
Sam!
Welcome to the wonderful world of PooterGeek!
all the best
Damian
Check out this debunking of depleted uranium myths—probably best to read the first bit and then scroll down to the quote from the United Nations Environment Programme if you don’t trust right-wing Americans.
And this article explains where those lies about a supposed massacre originated. You’ll never guess the source. Apparently, the slaughter that didn’t happen, didn’t even not happen on the day Goatee Beard claimed.
Yes, I’ve read it before. But the two reasons used in the article to dismiss radioactive risk from dU are silly.
They are:
1) It has a long half-life. Well sorry but that makes it *worse*. A long half-life does mean that you get a lower activity per mole of substance, but also means that its around for a long time
2) The article seems to suggest that alpha-emitters are inherently safe. No. Sorry, they’re not. It’s all very well saying that the radiation can be stopped by a piece of paper, but if the material is ingested alpha radiation is just about the worst kind due to it’s high density of ionisation.
Now, obviously the worst thing about dU weapons is that they are very dense; so heavy that its KE pretty much causes the combustion of anything that stands in its way. If I was going to be on the receiving end of a dU weapon then the last thing on my mind would be a statistical increase in my lifetime risk of cancer.
I really have no idea if the amount of dU used on a particular battlefield will produce a significant increase in the radiation dose to those who later live or work there.
But it *does* make the area more radioactive than it was before.