That Post-Match Voicemail In Full

[SVEN-GÖRAN ERIKSSON’s BEDROOM. The former England coach lies cradled in one arm of NANCY DELL’OLIO. As she bends her face over his shiny pate, he adds another tick to his “To Do” list next to the words “have sex” and below the phrases “polish glasses” and “Portuguese lesson”.]

SVEN: Nancy, my love-bagel, it iss now time for me to mess with the beetroot-like head of Little Lord Fergusson.

NANCY: Of course, darling.

[SVEN picks up one of five Sony-Ericsson™ mobiles holstered in a row on his bedside table and dials.]

MOBILE: brr brr…brr brr…brr brr…brr brr…brr brr…CLICK…

FERGIE: Hae theas Alx Fnaesn wear ples learf ynear meshnea afear toon. [BEEEEP]

SVEN: One-nil, One-nil. One-nil, one-nil. You are my Manchester beeyotch now. Make no misstake. Can you hear that sound, kilt boy? It iss the sound of my olive-skinned temptress licking my brow and complimenting me on my performance. My forehead is so bik because my footballing brain is so bik. Your face iss red because you have much to be red-faced about. Oh yess. You will be seeink Micah Richardss running at you in your nightmaress for monthss…monthss…

[SVEN hangs up, chuckling to himself, ticks “Mess with Fergusson’s head”, and picks up a book of Sudoku puzzles.]

SVEN: A little further forward now, Nancy…

Pulled Post

I just had a go at The Graun for an article about university admissions, but Chris correctly pointed out that I’d misread it, so I’ve removed the post. When I make a mistake here I always leave a record of it on the site so that’s the purpose of this entry.

The Irreligious Policemen

Not having a telly, I didn’t catch the latest from Richard Dawkins, but when I visited his Website to look for clips, I saw this photo of him:

Richard Dawkins

All I could think of was Michael Mann directing Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens in an atheist actioner:

[A convertible Ferrari screams through downtown in slow motion, reflections of streetlights flowing across the screen. Inside are DAWKINS and HITCHENS. They are both wearing pastel-coloured linen suits and sunglasses in the dark. Their Balliol ties are trailing backwards over their shoulders in the airflow. On the soundtrack, Anastacia‘s guitarist is widdling over a bank of Kurzweil keyboards and six tracks of gated snare drum.]

[There is an uncomfortably long helicopter shot of the city at night before we cut to an INTERIOR: The entrance to a gigantic evangelical church complex. A PREACHER shouts at HITCHENS.]

PREACHER: Yo’ fancy Oxford professor friend here is tryin’ ta tell me I’m some kind of monkey! I ain’t no monkey, mister!

[DAWKINS pulls out a semi-automatic and shoots round after round at the PREACHER’s feet so that he is forced to hop about to avoid the bullets.]

DAWKINS: Is that so? Well, you jolly well look like one now, “Reverend” Jareth.

[EXTERIOR: A junkyard at sunset. There is a graduated dark mauve filter over the lens that matches DAWKINS’ jacket. Four NUNS train assault rifles on him as he stands with his hands up, a matchstick protruding from the corner of his mouth.]

FIRST NUN: You’re not so skeptical when you’re staring at a shortcut to damnation, are you, Professor Dawkins?

[Suddenly the NUNS fly upward, screaming. Behind them, HITCHENS is at the controls of a crane. He hoists them into the air so violently that their weapons fall out of their hands onto the ground below.]

DAWKINS: If I didn’t know better then you might have just persuaded me to see some value in skyhooks, Hitch!

[For no apparent reason, our view of HITCHENS and DAWKINS is reversed in mid conversation, so they are on the opposite sides of the frame to where they started, and the distant ambient traffic noise is muted abruptly.]

HITCHENS: [swigging from a hip flask] Let’s just say that these young women seemed to me to be in need of some Enlightenment, Rick.

nuns with guns

THREE MAJOR RELIGIONS—TWO ENGLISHMEN—ONE ENEMY:

UNREASON

First Post!

Ever found yourself in the uncomfortable position of agreeing with something on career Conservative Iain Dale’s blog? Under a photo of Sierra Leoneans queuing to vote he writes:

This is the picture that should shame 39% of British adults … Why is it that 39% of people in this country at the last general election took our democracy for granted? More people voted in the Iraqi elections than in Britain.

Luckily, a bloggertarian is the first commenter and he saves the day:

There is no democracy in Britain anymore thanks to Adolf Blair and the PC brigade.

Over at another blog I don’t read often, Comment Is Free, Rory Maclean (or perhaps a sub-editor, not inaccurately summing up his post) asks:

In the 1960s and 1970s thousands of young westerners flocked east. Was it a hippie backlash that inspired al-Qaida?

To which the first commenter succinctly replies:

I think your head has come undone.

Ex-Scientist Recommends Government Offer Financial Incentive To Encourage Members Of CBI To Study Basic Economics

Following on from Tim’s comment, according to BBC News online:

More young people would take science degrees if they were given a financial incentive, claim industry experts.

[…but obviously we’d rather the government came up with this financial incentive while we continue to offer those with science degrees less than they are worth, and complain about a “shortage” of people willing to accept it…]

It stems from an emerging UK-wide skills shortage because young people are shying away from science subjects.

Britain will struggle to compete in the global market unless the trend is reversed, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) suggests.

Government-funded bursaries of £1 000 for science students could play a key role in this task, says the CBI.

You’re a well compensated, shiny-suited male executive spending a week at a conference in Amsterdam. In the evenings you experience a “shortage” of women willing to sleep with you. How do you solve this problem? Do you perhaps write to your MP demanding that the EU offers grants to nubile Ukranian girls to migrate to brothels in western Europe?… Oh, I’m not going to bother with this one again. If you’re bored then you can read this.

Lightly Worn

Beachy Head
Beachy Head
[click image to enlarge it]

I was eating breakfast in an hotel in Cambridge the Saturday morning after I shot that college ball. A tall, intense-looking man with a beard sat down at a table nearby. He pulled a hardback book out of his briefcase and began underlining paragraphs heavily with a soft pencil. I wanted to get up out of my chair, break the pencil, and slap him across his face with the book.

Partly, I felt this way because I was envious: he was probably there for an academic conference; I was in town to take photos. (On honest reflection, though, I enjoyed that weekend—hanging around the ball, meeting clients, reading on trains—more than I used to enjoy preparing and giving dull talks.) Mostly, the inelegance of what he was doing offended me. The man was highlighting so much of the volume that he hardly seemed to be discriminating at all. And the least bad way to mark out important paragraphs in a text is with a light, vertical line in each margin. People who read for a living know this. He was reading for show. His ostentatious “studiousness” grated on me. He was behaving like a schoolkid with his face up against open pages, trying to impress with his conspicuous concentration.

There was a deeper reason why his behaviour annoyed me. Our parents always encouraged my sister and me to look after books when we were growing up. It seems silly now that they are so abundant and cheap, but we would have book-covering evenings when we would all sit around in the living room with scissors and sticky tape and a big roll of transparent plastic and carefully encapsulate piles of them, even battered second-hand ones. We were like those immigrant families who keep the covers on their new sofas or the seats of their new cars. Come to think of it, we were an immigrant family and we did hide our black vinyl three-piece suite inside green fabric covers—and the chimney-breast in brick-effect wallpaper.

My mum taught me some good lessons, not that I paid enough attention to all of them at the time. I remember once she wrapped a copy of Wells’s The History of Mr Polly in brown paper. She was reading it on the bus on the way into work, further hidden inside a magazine. I asked her why she hadn’t used a see-through covering. She told me she didn’t want the other passengers to think she was showing off.

Later on that same Saturday in Cambridge, in one of those pasty places, I got chatting to a scientist from the Laboratory of Molecular Biology about protein bioinformatics. I’d never met him before, but struck up a conversation with him because he’d been talking to a student about something that I used to be interested in. Because he was a nice guy and a good teacher and clever enough not to feel threatened by me, he flattered me. He said (of my only interesting scientific hypothesis ever), “I like that: I’ve never thought of it that way before,” and towards the end of our conversation: “You’ve got lots of good ideas. Why aren’t you a scientist any more?”
I said (as if he needed telling), “Because no one will pay me. Sustaining a career in science isn’t about having good ideas. It’s about persuading someone to pay you to do science.”

I know enough to know that the few people who can sustain careers in what I fancied as my specialty are better than me. If what I had been talking about had fallen more completely within my new acquaintance’s area of expertise then he would have seen the weaknesses in my case. It’s easy to sit in a pie shop and outline cute physical models; it’s hard to go into a lab and accumulate enough evidence to persuade your peers of the usefulness of those models. Worse, contemporary research is different because there are too many data to absorb alone—it’s all but essential to be surrounded by good people to do great work.

No one owes me a living. Over years of falling off and getting back on the ladder I’ve learned one of the most important lessons you can learn in science and in life: unless you are independently wealthy, it’s not enough to find something you desperately want to do or even something that you think you are good at; you have to find something that someone else will give you money to do. I don’t believe that this is a bad thing. People who think it is are often sufferers from that TV talent show loser combination of spectacular incompetence and invincible self-belief. If I’d understood this properly before I went to university for the first time, perhaps back when I was sitting with my family, wrapping up books, I’d be happier now; but I have been surprisingly happy lately.

A couple of weeks back, I went to Beachy Head with a friend—not to realise a suicide pact, but because I wanted to hang out with someone nice, had had a productive morning, and needed to take my car for a run before a long drive to a wedding. It was a lovely day out. Beachy Head in the sunshine is dizzyingly pretty. This is unfortunate given the steep drop. The high ratio of continental European to British tourists suggested that it’s something of a “secret” attraction. I hadn’t even known until then that Beachy Head is next to Eastbourne, but it is.

I’d never seen so many funeral parlours, but Eastbourne has lots of young people too. On the evidence of the roadkill, though, even the seagulls go there to die. It’s a pleasant town to visit. In places it looks a bit like north-west London, but you couldn’t mistake it for anything other than an English seaside resort. It has more sand on its beach than Brighton and a relaxed elegance about its front.

At the end of this month, it will have been two years since the Rosalind Franklin Centre for Genomics Research (formerly the Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre) closed down, over a year since I became self-employed. I haven’t had to dip into my redundancy money since the start of 2007. I’m making a living.

For much of the time since I lost my job I’ve been bloody miserable, but I’ve tried not to bore my friends and readers too much with my terrible moods. In a time of personal disappointment, PooterGeek has been one thing of my own making that has been consistently successful. It would have failed if I’d filled its pages with self pity. As I sat on the beach eating fish-and-chips with my writerly friend, discussing books in the slightly manic way you can with a fellow fetishist—who also happens to have two degrees more in English than you have—I wasn’t quite so anxious about my circumstances. The frequency with which I’ve felt that good has increased recently. Thank you to everyone who has helped me to get this far. Thank you to everyone who has put up with my absences.

Nothing material has changed over these past few weeks. I’ve not achieved anything new. I’m not seeing anyone new. I’ve not moved anywhere new. It’s just that I’ve felt more comfortable with my not being who I wanted to be since before that photo over there → was taken. But I still feel uncomfortable sitting near pretentious twits who scrawl all over books. I should get over myself.

Whaddaya Expect If You Name A TV Show After A Totalitarian Icon?

And now, a real horror video. Remember the media storms about racism on UK Big Brother? Keep them in mind as you check out Amber, a Jewish contestant on the US version, complaining, without any hint of irony, to the only black contestant on the show about “selfish, money-hungry” Jews. You can spot them by their noses apparently. There’s plenty of anti-Semitic filth in the comments too.

Achtung!

This has been online for so long and is so funny that it’s hard to believe that no one has sent me a link to it before. Perhaps this is because it’s a German health and safety video and, for the first minute or so, is exactly as entertaining as that description suggests. But it gradually turns into a comedy gorefest to rival Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

Pestiferous Rhetoric

R C Metcalf, PhD, knows the erotic power of a polysyllabic adverb and harnesses it to denounce the “diversionary tactics” of public unbelievers, and to, er, divert their attentions to those damned Muslims:

The new atheists are a tumescent bunch, unquestionably articulate, yet consummately misguided. Their incendiary rhetoric can’t help but stir the emotions of the majority of America’s religious. Yet why do they ultimately choose to target Christianity above all other religious systems, when Islam presents a clear and present danger?

They routinely build a straw man version of Christianity based not upon the Ten Commandments and the morality of the Christ, but rather upon Old Testament Levitical laws that have long since been abrogated. They cannot be so naïve as to believe that Christians condone the murder of back talking children, yet that is exactly the sort of rhetoric they routinely tout.

It’s worth sticking with the gibbering to the climactic end, when he drags the Iraq war into things. Christ, can you imagine having to read R C’s thesis?

…No Dogs, No Irish…

bed-and-breakfast sheepdog
a bitch, currently residing at a fine Welsh bed-and-breakfast establishment
[click image to enlarge it]

There’s a discussion going on over at Chris Dillow’s place about whether or not guest house owners should be allowed to discriminate against gay couples. Whatever is implied by Chris’s musings on the matter, markets are not the solution to this problem. As I’ve pointed out here before, well-run markets don’t undermine prejudices, they’re just an efficient means for people to express them.

One commenter illustrates a point by reference to a photographer being made to shoot gay weddings. What makes me smile about this is that, happy as I am to photograph homosexuals (and/or blacks) getting hitched, my biggest fear—as the offspring of a black mother and a white father—is that a mixed-race couple will try to hire me. If you have to take a natural-light portrait of two faces together and one is very dark and the other is very pale then it’s a bitch to get the exposure right for both of them.

Talking of juxtapositions of black and white

Off The Grid

clouds and hills and sheep near Penybont
the middle of nowhere
[click image to enlarge it]

[A dirt track in Wales exactly seventy-five miles from the nearest Starbucks. POOTERGEEK is laden with three cameras, several lens bags, and a tripod. He is trying to open the gate to a field full of sheep by pressing a London Transport Oyster card against the hinge post. A small, smiley LOCAL MAN approaches.]

LOCAL MAN: That’s not going to get you through, young man.

POOTERGEEK: Do they take HSBC VISA?

[The LOCAL MAN shakes his head.]

POOTERGEEK: Bank of Zion?

LOCAL MAN: You have to lift up the catch and pull the bolt back.

POOTERGEEK: [Watching LOCAL MAN open gate for him] Oh, thanks for that. I’m not from round here.

[The LOCAL MAN raises one eyebrow.]

POOTERGEEK: Is there a Tesco Metro™ anywhere nearby?

LOCAL MAN: ?

[POOTERGEEK reaches into one of his bags and pulls out a Welsh phrasebook.]

POOTERGEEK: Pishticuff llandudno boyo richard burton plaid cymru Tesco Metro™?

LOCAL MAN: You’ll have to drive to Abergavenny for one of them.

POOTERGEEK: Oh.

LOCAL MAN: [pointing at POOTERGEEK’s crotch] Are you going to be alright wearing those? They look a bit tight for walking around the hills.

Character Development

Dismissing David Cameron and his gang as “toffs” is feeble, but I’ve noticed a few commentators refining that line lately. The Spectator blog points at Trevor Kavanagh, Political Editor of The Sun—there’s a job—claiming that the workrate of the Cameroonies compares unfavourably with that of either the Blairites or Brownites (as recounted by Alastair Campbell), and that the relative laziness of the current top Tories will be their downfall at the next General Election. Left-leaning gossip-monger Recess Monkey quotes John Redwood saying of the new Chancellor of the Exchequer:

“He’s got something of the scholarship boy about him.”

Over at Prospect‘s blog, William Skidelsky asks “David Cameron: intellectual?” (in the same way the magazine’s latest cover implied of Gordon Brown) and identifies the strain of snobbery underlying Redwood’s remark:

Bruce Anderson claimed that David Cameron, too, is an intellectual. “He has read and thought a great deal about politics and about the human condition,” Anderson writes. Other evidence for the proposition? “It must be remembered that Mr Cameron got a first at Oxford without being a slave to his books.”

Reading between the lines, we can see a contrast being implied between two intellectual types: on the one hand the bookish, “clunking” and “solipsistic” son of the manse; on the other the well-bred “son of the old rectory” who, in the best traditions of English upper-class effortlessness, breezed through Oxford, barely troubling to read a book, and still emerged with a first.

I love the idea that, rather than being a basic requirement of completing a degree, having “read and thought a great deal” about some area of study makes you an intellectual. I should have tried that in lab meetings: “Yes, this experiment does seem to show that my model is faulty, but I have read and thought a great deal about the matter.” Cue the pitying laughter of a room full of geeks.

Perhaps that’s why Prospect readers voted Noam Chomsky “the World’s leading public intellectual”: he might have been wrong and deceitful, but, over the course of his career, other teachers at MIT had awarded him an unprecedented 27 gold stars for book-learning.

The Pathetic Bookshop

It is an important day for Britain. Since the abrupt collapse of our manufacturing base, our economy depends heavily upon fictional characters. Together, Lara Croft, James Bond, The Teletubbies, Simon Cowell, and Harry Potter now account for 43 percent of GDP. From time to time, J K Rowling dials 141, calls Buckingham Palace, and mutters quietly: “I cahn buy an’ sell you any time, Frau Frumpy. Evvyfink norf o’ the border’s mine. Stick to your own manor, darlin’—or you might wake up wiv the ‘ead of a corgi on Phil-the-Greek’s side of the bed. Kna’ ‘at I mean?”

I’m at British Bookshops And Sussex Stationers buying some stationery. [If you followed that link then note well that this is the sort of company that takes its existing Website down while a new one is built. It’ll be relevant later.] Inside it’s a bit tense. Even before lunchtime, they have sold out of The New Book, but, in plain view at the back, is a table laden with pre-ordered and bagged copies of Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows, lined up in rows and waiting to be collected. There are at least two families within a few square metres of me wandering around asking after it. One of them includes a boy wearing a cape and NHS specs.

The Potter craze mystifies me. I’m not scared of big books—last week I finished a 900-page Indian epic—but Rowling’s stuff leaves me cold for two reasons: it bores me and it manages to both conform to a genre template and at the same time ignore the rules that make that template satisfying, to no artistic end. I visited Wikipedia to find out how it finishes and, sure enough, Rowling resolves her plot difficulties by pulling something out of her bottom again. [Not entirely true this time: see comment from a Potterite, below.] I am, therefore, not even thinking about buying a copy and instead am crouched down next to one of the service desks, staying out of trouble, reading about the invention of the piano.

Standing behind me is a nihce middle-aged Home Counties woman with Victoria Beckham sunglasses and hair the colour of freshly-stripped copper loudspeaker cable. She is explaining, with admirable patience, to the young male shop assistant that a work of popular fiction by “Margaret Kennedy” [I can’t remember the actual name, but she could] has just come out in hardback and wondering if he might be able to check to see whether or not they have it in stock.
“You do have all your books on your computer, don’t you?” she asks.
“Yes, we do,” he begins, “but we can’t search them by author name.”

I bury my face in my hands.

Round-Up For The Run Ragged

Over the past few days I’ve been busy. I’ll continue to be so over the next few days. Here are quick links to some of the things that have caught my eye lately.

Following up my recent post about David Cameron, not only were the voting slips in yesterday’s Ealing Southall by-election labelled “David Cameron’s Conservatives”, but his post-defeat soundbite has him repeatedly saying: “I would have liked to have done better”. It appears his ego is writing cheques his party can’t cash. Oh yes, and suck it up, Guido.

It’s less personally satisfying—indeed, it’s causing me actual physical pain to type this—but The Devil’s Kitchen makes a good and important point well here.

And, while I’m at it, here’s a link to his mate Mr E on Polly Toynbee’s attack on Boris Johnson:

Only in Pollyworld could a belief in academic selection and a cordial distrust of health and safety paranoia be considered “outrageous”, whereas routine anti-Semitism and consorting with men like Yusuf al-Qaradawi (“[A Muslim who converts to another religion] is no more than a traitor to his religion and his people and thus deserves killing”), is not even worth a mention.

Even when I lived in London I didn’t vote for Ken Livingstone—I think one year I might even have spoiled my ballot paper; if I lived there now then just thinking about the awful choice of candidates for mayor facing me would probably make my head explode.

My scientific approach to writings on any subject that, at first scan, appear fundamentally bogus is simply not to bother reading them in any depth. Fortunately, when it comes to health scares, around which such bogosity is sometimes fatally non-obvious to laypeople, there are doctors like Ben Goldacre who can be bothered to point it out in detail. (Admittedly, part of his motivation in this case was that he wanted to get the words “fuck” and “shithead” into the British Medical Journal, but that is in itself something to be admired.)

If you haven’t seen them before then these impossibly macho and non-work-safe covers for Harry Potter books are funny. Actually, they’re funny even if you have seen them before.

Regulars here know that, even if (because?) I don’t get any myself, I am politically relaxed about both sex and drugs. The recent ministerial confessions about cannabis use therefore strike me as comical. Tim has a go at the accompanying plans to change the law around the drug, but there is something I’d like to welcome about this discussion: even if the proposed change in the law is in the wrong direction the arguments being used to justify it do seem at least to be vaguely motivated by scientific findings, rather than by wanting to be seen to be “doing something”. I’m not even sure if legislation “against” cannabis is much of a vote-winner any more anyway.

And, according to my dad this morning, the latest (August) edition of PC Answers—that’s “PC” as in “Personal Computer”—gives PooterGeek a rave review. Perhaps my mum wrote it.

Unseen Square Footage

A couple of years back I planned a new running scenario on PooterGeek: Tora-Bora-nation Street. The idea was simple: Tony Blair and the rest of his family would drop into the local Corrie-style corner shop from time to time and I would depict their developing relationship with the new proprietors—with the Blairs unaware that the people now running the place were in fact Osama Bin Laden and his second-in-command.

There would have been many a rib-tickling moment as Osama had to hide his satellite phone from clueless Special Branch men behind stacks of Daily Mails, Bin Laden’s deputy failed miserably in his attempts to develop a Cape Fear intimacy with Blair’s daughter, and Cherie placed orders for bizarre New Age magazines.

I emailed a bunch of my regulars and asked them whether they thought the idea was in bad taste or racist or just not funny and they all replied encouragingly. But in the end I decided not to do it.

Today I was shocked to see a thread on Comment Is Free where some of the comments were worth reading and it made me think I might have been over-cautious.

Giving Cinema-Goers The Heebie-BDs

You’re watching a movie and Bruce Dern:

Bruce Dern

or Brad Dourif:

Brad Dourif

appears on screen.

What’s your next thought?

  1. “Oh he’s going to turn out to be a sympathetic, mentally stable, all-round mensch of a character.”
  2. “Hey, here’s Uncle B: twenty-four-hour party person and master of benign slapstick!”
  3. “If, some time before the end of this reel, he’s pointing a gun at the male lead, twitching spasmodically, and explaining why the voices from his refrigerator made him do what he did, I won’t be at all surprised.”

Do you think their rellies ever get Bruce or Brad round to babysit? How do the children being babysat feel about this? Is there a special salon somewhere in Hollywood where you can get stalker hair?

On The Preservation Of Source Texts

Yesterday morning, I walked out of the building that my flat is in to find that the telephone box immediately outside it had been marked with words along the lines of:

HEY NIGGAZ
KKK 4 ME

in six-inch high black letters. Today I was going to write a post about it—not an “end of civilization as we know it” kind of thing; just some PooterGeekian whimsy about the declining traditions of calligraphy and illumination in these days of txtmsg and iBlackberry—so I went outside to copy the message down exactly, but it was gone.

Dialectical Minimalism

Damian:

[T]he impression I get is that Norm is more forgiving of Eagleton’s errors of reasoning than he should be

Norm:

Damian leaves an impression about my viewpoints that I feel I have a right to comment on.

Damian:

I’d happily place a bet with Norm on which of the two of them will be considered worth reading in two hundred years’ time.

But durability isn’t the point here; correctness is.

Norm:

[M]y endorsement of the passages I quote from Eagleton’s review is based on having thought about them and not on any speculative forward projection into the remote future of Dawkins’ and Eagleton’s respective reputations.

Damian:

I’m not going to persuade you or Norm to share this belief of mine

Norm:

But speaking for myself, I won’t be persuaded from the opinions that I hold on these matters by mere pejorative description.

********************

Norm:

All I did in that post was to commend to the readers of my blog three particular themes from Eagleton’s review.

Norm:

Richard Dawkins is taking a pasting from Terry Eagleton in the LRB

Ball Lighting

20260014.jpg

A couple of weeks back I attended one of the two “reasonably smart” evening occasions that PooterGeekers kindly invited me to in response to my appeal so that I could test out some wacky lighting techniques. This was photographing various Latin American performers at a Cambridge college ball. I’m sure you’ll agree such a setting can be a challenging one in which to perform…

20260007.jpg

…but such is my love for my art that I endured, exposing myself to whatever spectacles my surroundings presented, recording them faithfully in the tradition of the great masters of reportage…

20260022.jpg

A very few of my experiments worked. I was trying out a range of freaky home-made diffusers on my flash guns. Sadly, some of them interfered with the infra-red beams—which I didn’t want—as well as softening the light source—which I did—so my hit rate was low and the results weren’t what I was hoping for, but that’s exactly why I didn’t feel I could charge anyone money for them. Worse, the scanner at the lab used to digitize the negatives introduced lots of noise to the (intentionally) dark originals.

20220014a.jpg

Thanks to percussionist Martin Goodson—in the foreground of the image above—for getting me on the guest list. The excellent band is called Lido66.

20230015.jpg
20240007.jpg

Our Survey Said

Further to Anthony’s latest post about the execution of the head of China’s Food and Drug Administration, this week’s Alanis Morissette Award goes to the Beijing Public Security and Statistics Bureaux. From Reuters, via The Scotsman:

A Briton who has spent years trying to convince foreigners that China is not as repressive as Western media often portray it to be has been ordered to stop publication of his politically sensitive newsletter.

Bald Eagleton

I write short posts. Much goes unsaid. I often write ironically. Some subjects are better approached that way; or it’s just more fun for me to tackle them sideways. What I do say, I say in plain English in the hope that my words at least are clear to everyone who reads them.

Reading Norm today I realise that I wasn’t clear enough in my post yesterday. I wanted to allude to the wrongness of many of Terry Eagleton’s views (and his approaches) and the brokeness of many of his arguments for them, rather than to accuse Norm of being a poor scholar. He isn’t. The suggestion that Norm hadn’t been paying attention was a joke. I sometimes make those here. Even when they are funny, they die when they are explained, but here’s a translation: “Jeez, Norm, you’ve been reading this guy’s stuff for yonks and you still didn’t notice what gibberish he produces?! Mate, tell me you missed it because you were half asleep.”

I’m well aware that—just as he’s listened to plenty of Bob Dylan—Norm has read plenty of Terry Eagleton and read it in detail. My friendly dig wouldn’t have made any sense otherwise. As he knows too well, if I’m really going to give Norm a hard time about something he’s written then I start an argument with him in person, on the phone, or by email. Indeed, I drafted a robust criticism of this post of Norm’s when he wrote it, but decided not to publish it.

As Norm notes by pointing to Oliver Kamm’s post about Eagleton, at least one of Eagleton’s political errors of judgment was not a laughing matter, but the impression I get is that Norm is more forgiving of Eagleton’s errors of reasoning than he should be (and they’re grave ones). This is a credit to Norm’s intellectual generosity and loyalty, but it doesn’t mean he’s right.

Rather than wade through my back issues of the LRB—yes, I used to subscribe, God help me; in fact, I briefly had three subs—and blockquote you all to death to make the more general point, I just threw a paper plane from the back of the lecture theatre. But the witless snobbery and logical incoherence of that review by Eagleton of Dawkins’ The God Delusion is one grubby tip of a moraine of pseudo-intellectualizing. If it were possible for either of the two of us to collect, I’d happily place a bet with Norm on which of the two of them will be considered worth reading in two hundred years’ time.

But durability isn’t the point here; correctness is. Terry Eagleton is frequently, demonstrably wrong. I’m not going to persuade you or Norm to share this belief of mine because no demonstration will appear here. That would be both hard work of a kind that I am no longer paid to do and would require me to re-read other essays by Eagleton. Like that hypothetical bet, it won’t happen; because life, like my blog post, is too short.

Flying The Vee For Israel

The Israel Ministry of Tourism would have you believe that the tiny Mediterranean state is a hip young place full of sunkissed, lean ‘n’ lovely twenty- and thirtysomethings, alternately running high-tech start-ups and hanging out on the beach playing frisbee with their gay friends.

But the country has a dark underbelly. If you want to see it in close-up then follow the link to the YouTube video Israeli Guitar Riff of the week: Power Rangers Theme Song.

Bitches From Hell

I’ve observed before that there are good reasons to criticise Cherie Blair, but it’s revealing that those aren’t the reasons why most people in the media criticise her. It’s worse than that: they hate her—and for the oldest human reason of all: she’s “not one of us”.

Cherie Booth was a poor north-of-England Catholic girl from broken home who fought her way up to the top with brains and hard work. As Mrs Blair she’s been determined to make shedloads of money and hates talking to the press. Short of having had a brief career in soft porn modelling, married-and-divorced Lord Macca of Loch Kodak, and taken a giant-Toblerone-sized chunk out of his Swiss bank account, it would be hard to imagine biography more likely to make her a target for the Polly Fillers (if not the Glenda Slaggs) of the UK’s national newspapers.

In a week when BBC Radio replaces a Jeremy with a Julian on its flagship current affairs phone-in—I suppose it’s better than replacing a Dimbleby with a Dimbleby—it’s worth reading this at Mick Hartley’s place. Guess what? Cherie is “chippy“.

Newer Posts
Older Posts